A clear animation still needs a careful review.
Smooth motion makes a sequence easy to watch. Reviewing it means asking a different question: does this explanation preserve the actual product?
Begin with the component inventory.
Compare the model with the drawing or parts list. Check repeated items individually: four holes do not automatically prove four identical fasteners, and mirrored parts may have different geometry. A missing part should not disappear from the requirements simply because the remaining assembly renders cleanly.
Check dimensions and orientation.
Distinguish dimensions stated in the source from dimensions derived or estimated during interpretation. Look for scale, panel thickness, hole locations and the direction of each part. If a critical detail is missing, resolve it with the source owner.
Look closely at the hardware.
Standard screws, dowels and bolts make the connection easier to explain, but the source still determines which hardware belongs there. Verify quantities and placement. Illustrative fastener rotation is a visual cue; it does not establish thread engagement, torque or installation fit.
Review the sequence against the real task.
A collision-free path is one constraint. It does not account for every tool, fixture, support or procedure needed in a workshop. Ask whether the sequence follows the approved instructions and whether anything must be installed, inspected or adjusted before it becomes hidden.
- Are all components and fasteners present?
- Are dimensions and assumptions traceable to their source?
- Do parts arrive in the correct orientation?
- Does the order match the intended procedure?
- Are simplifications clear to the intended viewer?
Approve for the intended use.
A sales overview and a technician's work instruction serve different purposes. Decide who will use the output and which details they need before calling it complete. Keep the reviewed source and corresponding model with the delivered video so later changes can be traced.
Latch's current geometric checks support visual review. They are not manufacturing, installation or engineering certification.
What we want to improve next.
Our review roadmap brings source references, uncertain details and step editing into a visual workspace. The aim is to make expert corrections easier to apply and easier to understand.